|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Overview of Introductory Physics Reform
- the OLD (all courses prior to Fall 96)
- The NEW (all courses after Fall 99)
- The Reform (www.physics.uiuc.edu/Research/PER/Course_Revisions.html)
- Faculty Participation
- The Pieces (Lectures, Discussions, Labs, Exams, Homework)
- How to Sustain the Reform?
- Infrastructure and Culture
- Physics Education Research
- Case Study: Interactive Examples
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Lectures, Discussions, Labs, Homework, Exams
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Three swimmers can swim equally fast relative to the water. They have a race to see who can swim
across a river in the least time.
Relative to the water, Beth (B) swims perpendicular to the flow, Ann
(A) swims upstream, and Carly (C) swims downstream. Which swimmer wins the race?
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- What we used to do:
- Exam composed of 4 multi-part calculational problems.
- Exam graded by faculty + TAs immediately afterward. Subjective partial credit given based on
student’s approach.
- Problems?
- Students can learn to do these problems without understanding what
they are doing.
- Whining, cheating on regrades, questionable application of partial
credit.
- What we do now:
- Exam composed of Multiple Choice questions, both qualitative and quantitative, often
using the same physical situation. We have always believed in the
importance of conceptual understanding, but students didn’t believe us
because we never explicitly asked these questions before!
- Partial credit scheme for quantitative (5 possible answers)
questions. Students can choose
to get reduced credit if they can successfully eliminate unphysical
answers.
|
|
13
|
- Weekly Homework Assignments are done on the Web, using the TYCHO system
developed by Denny Kane at Illinois.
- Preflights
- Students submit answers (usually multiple choice plus text box for
explanation)
- Analysis tools available for faculty
- Homework A
- Quantitative and symbolic questions (enter number or expression),
unlimited submissions.. Fixed “help” statements available.
- Immediate response.
|
|
14
|
- Very Important Question
- People who create the reform are usually not the same kind of people
who enjoy making the trains run on time.
- Two Keys for Us
- Establish Infrastructure (and change the culture)
- People (veteran faculty, computing help, lecture, lab &
secretarial support, new Assoc Head position)
- Computing (all materials on central server, easily accessed by all)
- Culture Change (Welcome to 1XX, here’s how we do things….)
- Made easier by Team teaching
- Establish Physics Education Research Group
- Basis for continuing interest (not based on making trains run on time)
- Assessment of reforms
- Allows for “continuous change”
- On to specific example:
- Creation and Assessment of Interactive Example
|
|
15
|
- In all other aspects of our revision, we have “borrowed freely” from the
work of others!
- We created Interactive Examples (IEs) to address a specific problem for
which we could find no existing solution.
- The Problem:
- It’s been our experience that too many students see “concepts” and “calculations”
as two totally separate and unrelated activities.
- When given a quantitative question, most students will NOT think
about the CONCEPTS that are involved.
- When given a qualitative question, most students will never consider
writing down an appropriate equation… math is NOT seen as a TOOL
- Our Solution:
- Create web-based exercises that engage the student in the solution of
difficult quantitative problems using a “concept-based” method.
- Implementation status:
- We have created about 125 IEs for five courses at Illinois
- These IEs are being used for credit at 10 other institutions
|
|
16
|
- Base question is a quantitative problem (multi-step).
- Students can request help which comes in the form of more questions.
- These questions are designed to guide the student along a path
suggested by the UMASS PERG:
- Conceptual Analysis: What concepts and/or principles
determine what will happen in the physical situation? Graphical
representations? Qualitative
Behavior?
- Strategic Analysis: What general approach to take? Develop a plan for applying the
principles identified in conceptual analysis.
- Quantitative Analysis: What are the appropriate equations for this
problem. Work out the
mathematical solution.
- Meta Analysis: What have we
done? Reflect on, make sense of
the previous analyses. IEs use
the optional follow-up questions to do this task.
- Students can opt to answer the base question at any time.
- Eventually, enough help is given to solve the problem (it is an
“example”!)
- Once the base question is answered correctly:
- A Recap is given (Conceptual, Strategic and Quantitative Analyses).
- Follow-Up Questions (optional, i.e. no credit) are asked.
|
|
17
|
- They love them!
- We introduced some IEs to a class in another research university that
had been using a well-known web-based homework system.
- We Classified the free response Comments from the class:
- Enthusiastic
Positive
Neutral
Negative Awful
- 57% 38% 5% 0 0
|
|
18
|
- Final Exam Questions can be repeated (Pre and Post IE Implementation) to
measure changes in Student Performance.
- Physics 112 (E & M)
- Pre-IE: Fall98,Fall99,Fall00
Spring98, Spring99,Spring00,Spring01
- Post-IE: Fall01,Fall02,Fall03
Spring02,Spring03
- Physics 111 (Mechanics)
- Pre-IE: Fall99,Fall00,Fall01 Spring00,Spring01,Spring02
- Post-IE: Fall02,Fall03
Spring03
- Measure Change in Average Score on Individual Questions
|
|
19
|
- How “equivalent” are the Pre-IE and Post-IE semesters?
- If we wish to attribute any
observed improved Post-IE student performance to the implementation of
IEs, we first need to establish the level of “improvements” in Pre-IE
and Post-IE semesters that cannot be due to IEs.
|
|
20
|
- Do Post-IE (Spring02/03) vs Pre-IE (Spring99/00/01)
|
|
21
|
- Combine Spring and Fall Results
- Are Spring and Fall Results
Consistent?
- Plot Differences of Averages on
Each Question in Spring and Fall
|
|
22
|
- Combine Spring and Fall Results
- Are Spring and Fall Results
Consistent?
- Plot Differences of Averages on
Each Question in Spring and Fall
|
|
23
|
- We have successfully reformed all of our introductory physics courses.
- The Big Idea: Integrate all aspects of a course using interactive
engagement methods based on physics education research in a team
teaching environment.
- We have effected organizational change to sustain this reform.
- Establish Infrastructure (and change the culture)
- People, Computing (Welcome to Phys 1XX, here’s how we do things..)
- Establish Physics Education Research Group
- Allows for “continuous change”
|